What is leadership?

Leadership is a broad topic that touches every aspect of organizational life—from how decisions are made to how people experience their work. Before we explore formal definitions and frameworks, let’s start by examining our own understanding and experiences of leadership.

Initial Discussion on Leadership

What is leadership to you?

Our definitions of leadership and the leadership styles we prefer and try to emulate will be largely based on personal experiences and preferences.

Some common aspects of effective leadership that people identify include:

Not playing favorites
Helping the people who report to you grow
Providing helpful and timely feedback as much as possible
Making time for and having direct conversations
Making decisions decidedly and communicating them in a way that your expectations are understood
Setting realistic goals and leaving room for flexibility within plans
Establishing consequences and following through on them
Focusing on strategy and the big picture
Delegating tasks and monitoring work

Poll: What Does Leadership Mean to You?

Take a moment to share your immediate associations with leadership.

Discussion Question
What does leadership mean to you?
Answer on Poll Everywhere: pollev.com/alainabrandt831

What is leadership on an international level?

Leadership also operates at macro scales—between nations, industries, and linguistic communities.

China’s products are all over the world and China owns large percentages of key natural resources worldwide. The United States is very strong militarily. What does leadership mean in the context of Mexico? What has leadership meant at different stages of Mexico’s history?
English is viewed by some as the de facto language of business and therefore leadership, even though English is spoken by only 20% of the world’s population. Only 5% of the world’s population speaks English natively. (Sources: 10 most spoken languages in the world in 2025 via ICLS and the Census Bureau’s World Population Clock) Chinese and Spanish are also lingua franca. How does speaking these big languages relate to leadership?

Reflection Questions:

How do economic power, military strength, and cultural influence interact to create international leadership?
What forms of leadership might be particularly important for countries or regions that don’t dominate through economic or military power?
As professionals in translation, localization, and interpretation, what role might you play in facilitating—or challenging—certain forms of international leadership?

Recognizing Effective and Ineffective Leadership

Before exploring academic frameworks, let’s ground our discussion in real experiences. Think about leaders you’ve encountered—whether in academic settings, workplaces, community organizations, or public life. What distinguished the effective leaders from those who struggled?

Characteristics of Effective Leaders

People who lead effectively tend to:

Communicate clearly and consistently – Their messages are understandable, and they maintain consistent standards and expectations
Demonstrate integrity through actions, not just words – They align what they say with what they do
Empower others to develop skills and take initiative – They create opportunities for team members to grow and contribute
Make decisions thoughtfully while remaining decisive – They gather input without getting paralyzed by indecision
Acknowledge mistakes and adjust course when needed – They model accountability and adaptability
Show genuine interest in the wellbeing and growth of team members – They see people as whole individuals, not just workers
Create environments where people feel safe to express concerns or ideas – They welcome feedback and dissenting views
Balance attention to immediate tasks with long-term vision – They manage both the urgent and the important

Characteristics of Ineffective Leadership

Leaders who struggle often:

Create confusion through unclear or contradictory communication – Team members receive mixed messages or don’t understand expectations
Show favoritism or treat team members inconsistently – They apply different standards to different people
Take credit for others’ work or deflect blame for problems – They undermine trust and morale
Make decisions impulsively or avoid making necessary decisions – They either act without thinking or fail to act when action is needed
Micromanage tasks or provide no guidance at all – They oscillate between extremes rather than finding appropriate levels of involvement
Prioritize appearing powerful over being effective – They focus on status and control rather than results
Discourage questions or treat feedback as insubordination – They create environments where people are afraid to speak up
Focus exclusively on short-term results at the expense of sustainability – They sacrifice long-term health for immediate gains

Reflection Questions

Consider these questions as you think about leadership you’ve observed:

Can you think of specific examples where you’ve seen these characteristics in action? What were the consequences?
Are there situations where characteristics from the “ineffective” list might actually be appropriate or necessary?
How might cultural context influence what’s considered effective leadership?
What role does power play in determining whether someone can be an effective leader?
Think about a time when you had the opportunity to lead (formally or informally). Which characteristics did you embody? Which did you struggle with?

How Culture Affects Perceptions of Leadership

Leadership doesn’t exist in a vacuum—cultural context profoundly shapes who we perceive as leaders and what we consider effective leadership. What looks like strong leadership in one cultural context might be seen as inappropriate or ineffective in another.

Cultural Dimensions in Leadership

Different cultures value different leadership qualities:

Power Distance: In cultures with high power distance (like many parts of Asia and Latin America), hierarchical leadership with clear authority may be expected and respected. In cultures with low power distance (like Scandinavia or New Zealand), more egalitarian, collaborative leadership styles may be preferred.
Individualism vs. Collectivism: Individualistic cultures (like the United States) may reward leaders who promote individual achievement and autonomy. Collectivist cultures (like Japan or Mexico) may value leaders who prioritize group harmony and collective success.
Communication Styles: Direct communication cultures may see straightforward, explicit leadership as honest and efficient. Indirect communication cultures may view this same approach as rude or unsophisticated.
Time Orientation: Some cultures prioritize long-term planning and patience, while others focus on immediate results and quick decision-making.

The Problem of “Babble Bias”

One particularly interesting cultural bias in leadership selection is what researchers call “babble bias” or “babble effect”—the tendency to promote people who speak the most, rather than those who contribute the most valuable ideas.

Studies have found that in U.S. corporate contexts, people who talk more in meetings are often perceived as more competent and more leader-like, regardless of the actual quality of their contributions. This creates several problems:

Mistaking Quantity for Quality: The person who speaks most frequently isn’t necessarily the person with the best ideas or deepest expertise.
Cultural Disadvantage: People from cultures that value listening, careful consideration before speaking, or deference to more senior colleagues may be systematically overlooked for leadership roles.
Personality Bias: This bias favors extroverted communication styles over introverted ones, potentially excluding thoughtful, reflective individuals who might be excellent leaders.
Language Barriers: Non-native speakers who may need more time to formulate thoughts in a second language can be disadvantaged, even when they have superior expertise.

For Your Field: In translation, localization, and interpretation, this bias is particularly relevant. The people who understand linguistic nuance and cultural context most deeply may not be the people who dominate meetings. Excellent linguists may be careful and precise in their speech—qualities that can be mistaken for lack of confidence or leadership potential.

Other Cultural Biases in Leadership Perception

Beyond babble bias, consider these additional cultural influences on who is seen as a leader:

Gender and Leadership: Expectations about gender roles vary dramatically across cultures and affect who is perceived as a credible leader
Age and Experience: Some cultures deeply respect elder leadership, while others valorize youth and innovation
Educational Background: The value placed on formal credentials versus practical experience varies
Physical Presence: Cultural norms about appropriate assertiveness, body language, and physical space affect leadership perception
Accent and Language: Speaking with certain accents or in certain languages can trigger biases about competence and authority

Reflection Questions

How might your own cultural background influence what you consider “good leadership”?
Can you think of a time when you witnessed someone being perceived as a leader (or not a leader) based on cultural factors rather than actual competence?
In multilingual, multicultural teams common in translation and localization, how might leaders navigate these different cultural expectations?
What specific steps could organizations take to reduce babble bias and other cultural biases in identifying and developing leaders?

Research Activity: Leadership Frameworks from the Literature

While personal experience and cultural context shape our understanding of leadership, scholars and practitioners have developed frameworks to analyze leadership more systematically. Your task is to research one established leadership framework and share your findings with the class.

Choose a Framework

Select one of the following leadership frameworks to research:

Established Leadership Theories:

Transformational Leadership – Focuses on inspiring and motivating followers to exceed expectations and embrace change
Servant Leadership – Emphasizes serving others and putting the needs of followers first
Situational Leadership – Suggests effective leaders adapt their style based on the situation and the development level of followers
Authentic Leadership – Centers on self-awareness, transparency, and ethical behavior
Distributed Leadership – Views leadership as a shared practice rather than concentrated in individuals
Adaptive Leadership – Focuses on helping organizations navigate complex challenges and change
Inclusive Leadership – Emphasizes creating environments where diverse team members feel valued and able to contribute fully
Transactional Leadership – Based on exchanges between leaders and followers (rewards for performance)
Participative Leadership – Involves team members in decision-making processes

Research and Post on Discussion Forum

Research your chosen framework and create a post in our discussion forum that addresses:

Your post should include:

Framework Overview (2-3 sentences)
- What is this framework called and who developed it?
- What is the main idea or focus of this leadership approach?
Key Principles (3-5 bullet points)
- What are the core principles or practices this framework recommends?
Real-World Example (1 short paragraph)
- Provide one concrete example of this framework in action (could be a specific leader, organization, or situation)
Relevance to Language Services (2-3 sentences)
- How might this framework be useful for leaders in translation, localization, or interpretation contexts?
Your Perspective (1-2 sentences)
- What aspect of this framework resonates with you? Or what concerns do you have about it?
Sources (at least 2)
- Include links or citations to your sources

Formatting: Keep your post concise—aim for 300-400 words total. Use headers, bullet points, or bold text to make your post easy to scan.

Deadline: Post by [instructor will specify date]

Engagement: After posting your own research, read at least three classmates’ posts and leave thoughtful comments or questions.

Recommended Starting Points

Google Scholar – Search for “[framework name] leadership theory”
Harvard Business Review – Accessible articles that bridge theory and practice
Your University Library – Look for peer-reviewed articles
Books – Many frameworks have foundational texts (e.g., James MacGregor Burns for Transformational Leadership, Robert Greenleaf for Servant Leadership)

Self-Reflection: Your Leadership Journey

As you work through the materials in this unit, consider these questions about your own relationship to leadership:

Understanding Your Biases

What biases do I bring to the role of a leader and a people manager?
What assumptions do I make about what makes someone “leadership material”?
How have my cultural background, education, and personal experiences shaped my views on authority and leadership?

Recognizing Others’ Biases

What biases do other people bring to the role of leader or people manager?
How do factors like age, gender, race, nationality, or educational background affect who is seen as a leader?
What stereotypes about leadership exist in your field or industry?

Considering AI and Technology

What biases does generative AI reflect when used in leadership and people management contexts?
How might AI tools reproduce or amplify existing biases about leadership?
What are the benefits and risks of using AI for leadership development or decision-making?

Navigating the Employee Perspective

What biases do people have as employees? How can those be navigated ethically and practically?
What do employees need from leaders, and how might those needs vary across individuals?
How can leaders create space for employees to voice concerns or challenges?

Building Better Systems

How can we bring enough awareness and provide enough structure to mitigate biases in employees and leadership?
How do we leave room for flexibility and natural human error while maintaining accountability?
What systems or practices might help create more equitable and effective leadership?

Your Personal Development

What kind of leader do you want to become?
What specific skills or knowledge do you need to develop?
How will you hold yourself accountable for leading in ways that align with your values?

Reflection Activity: Keep a leadership journal throughout this unit. After each class session or activity, write a brief entry (200-300 words) responding to one or two of the questions above. At the end of the unit, review your entries and identify patterns or insights that have emerged.

📥 Download this Content

Find this file on our repo and download it.

🤖 GAI Study Prompts

Copy the downloaded content and try it with these prompts:

“Help me understand the difference between [Framework A] and [Framework B] leadership theories. What situations might favor one over the other?”
“I’m researching [specific leadership framework]. Can you help me find examples of organizations or leaders who have explicitly used this approach?”
“Generate a scenario where a leader in a translation/localization company faces an ethical dilemma. Walk me through how different leadership frameworks might approach this situation.”
“Quiz me on the key principles of [leadership framework I’m researching].”
“I identified these characteristics of ineffective leadership in my workplace: [list characteristics]. Help me analyze what’s happening and suggest constructive approaches to address these issues.”
“What are common critiques of [specific leadership framework]? Help me understand the limitations and controversies.”
“Create a case study where a multicultural, multilingual team needs strong leadership. What specific challenges might arise, and what leadership approaches might be most effective?”
“Help me prepare for my presentation on [leadership framework] by suggesting ways to make the content engaging and relevant to language services professionals.”

Next Activity: From Employee to Manager